With the introduction of a new, stricter phone policy for the 2025-2026 school year, nearly every student at RM is feeling the effects. However, while the school system might see a ban on cellular devices as a clean, efficient strategy to increase engagement in the classroom, this policy likely will not reap the benefits that RM administration expects. In fact, phone bans are an ineffectual solution to the burgeoning problem of cell phone use, and school systems should instead be investing in mental health and well-being resources for students.
First of all, it is important to recognize that while phone bans seem like an intuitive solution to improve student welfare, bans are not particularly well-supported by research. The University of Birmingham has shown that, “adolescents in schools with phone bans failed to show any improvements in other areas, such as anxiety, depression, sleep duration, academic performance, or disruptive classroom behavior.” Additionally, phone bans failed to reduce phone use at all, as the same study proved that restricting phone use during school, “didn’t translate to a drop in overall daily or weekly screen time.”
Furthermore, students at RM seem to agree that phone bans are ineffective., “People who want to look at their phones are going to find a way to look at it anyways,” said junior Jiajing Zheng. In fact, many people even feel that this new cell phone policy has damaged their educational experience. Since school-issued Chromebooks block numerous sources such as news sites and magazines, students often rely on their phones to access academic resources. “Often, [they’re] blocked on my Chromebook and I can’t find what I need. And can I use my phone to find it? No. So, I can’t even do my classwork during class,” junior Ada Ingram said.
Overall, it is clear that stricter phone policies do not have the impact that they claim; bans may introduce harsher penalties for students caught using cell phones during classes, yet these penalties only encourage students to be sneakier about their phone usage. In addition, these bans also punish students who genuinely do want to do their work, but need resources provided by their phones to complete assignments. While school systems might rely on phone bans as a simple, universal fix to the growing adolescent phone addiction, implementing cell phone bans is like putting a bandaid over the issue instead of addressing the actual problem.
Schools continue to rely on bans because they are easy, cheap, and appear to be working, but if they actually want to see a positive impact on students’ well-being and classroom engagement, schools should shift their focus onto providing more robust mental health support resources. In adolescents, mental health is becoming a worsening problem, as a study by the WHO states, “globally, it is estimated that one in seven (14.3 percent) of 10-19 year olds experience mental health conditions, yet these remain largely unrecognized and untreated.” While schools like RM claim to care about mental health, actual efforts to improve the well-being of students have been meager, resulting in the mental health crisis being one of the most significant yet disregarded issues in the present day.
If schools really want to reduce phone usage, they should recognize that phone use and mental health have a strong inverse relationship; in other words, as mental health conditions worsen, phone use increases, and vice versa. It is evident that if schools want to actually address the problem of phones in the classroom, the solution is not an ineffective and harmful ban; instead, schools need to pivot towards providing better mental health resources.
If you would like to voice your opinion on an issue you feel is relevant to our community, please do so here. Anyone is able and welcome to submit a Letter to the Editor, regardless of journalistic experience or writing skills. Submissions may be published either online or in a print issue.
